The reviewed work by Gerdien W. Meijerink and Karl Shutes is not as scientific as they themselves call for. As the comment demonstrates, selective use of literature, misinterpretations, conclusions not justified by the sources, and lack of (own) quantitative evidence are amongst the shortcomings their work has. It is annoying that such papers, which are one-sided, claim to be the scientific truth while, particularly in the last years, the scientific debate has moved considerably.
Veranstaltungen / Aktionen
16.06.2022 | Am Beispiel des Lithiumabbaus in Bolivien werden die globalen Auswirkungen unseres Rohstoffhungers diskutiert. Online-Veranstaltung von 19.00 - 20.30 UhrMehr erfahren