Startseite Kontakt
Veranstaltungen / Aktionen

Praktikum Unternehmensverantwortung & nachhaltige Beschaffung ab 15.01.2018

20.10.2017 | Ein Praktikum bei WEED bietet Einblicke in die Arbeit einer Nichtregierungsorganisation und die Möglichkeit, Erfahrung zu sammeln in politischer Öffentlichkeits-, Lobby- und Kampagnenarbeit.

Mehr erfahren

WEED auf Fachkonferenz in Thüringen

27.09.2017 | IT-Fachkonferenz vom Verein "Zukunftsfähiges Thüringen e.V." und dem Arbeitskreis "Faire und nachhaltige Beschaffung" mit WEED in Erfurt

Mehr erfahren



W&E Infobrief

Offener Brief der Zivilgesellschaft zu Steuervermeidung von Unternehmen

09.03.2015: Brief von 30 Organisationen mit konkreten Forderungen zur Steuergerechtigkeit in Europa an den Kommissionspräsidenten Juncker

   Offener Brief der Zivilgesellschaft zu Steuervermeidung von Unternehmen

As European civil society organisations, we are writing to call on the European Commission to propose ambitious and broad-ranging action, starting with the forthcoming Tax Transparency Package, to ensure that large companies pay their fair share of tax where their real economic activity takes place, both in Europe and in developing countries.

LuxLeaks is only one of a string of scandals which make clear that large companies are able to legally avoid huge sums in tax. The damage to public trust in the fairness of the tax system has been incalculable and will escalate if the problem is not promptly and comprehensively addressed. To do so, Europe needs to abandon the self-harming assumption that ill-defined notions of "competitiveness” can justify the manipulation of tax rules by corporations, the deliberate creation of tax loopholes by certain Member States in order to undercut other countries and the free run given to accounting firms and other lobbyists to shape tax regimes in their own interests.

By allowing such practices to continue in Europe, we are not only harming ourselves. The International Monetary Fund has found that global tax competition has a disproportionately harmful effect on developing countries. By failing to adequately reform Europe’s tax system, we inflict financial damage on countries which we are trying to help out of poverty.

So we agree with Commissioners Moscovici and Vestager that 2015 is the year in which reform of corporate taxation needs to show concrete results. We also agree with the governments of France, Germany and Italy that Europe needs "common, binding rules on corporate taxation to curb tax competition and fight aggressive tax planning." These rules need to ensure:

1. Greater transparency towards the public as well as tax authorities, including full public disclosure by large companies of their tax payments and other key data on a country-by-country basis. The European Parliament has requested this reform several times and we urge the Commission to promptly present a legislative proposal for the public reporting of the types of information included in the OECD’s proposed model template.

The Commission should also encourage all Member States to create public registries of the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts during the implementation of the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive and promote the full public disclosure of cross-border tax rulings (not just their exchange between Member States). The Commission should promote developing countries’ access to automatic exchange of tax information, on a non-reciprocal basis if necessary, as a deterrent to cross-border tax evasion of the kind revealed by the recent HSBC scandal.

2. Strong legislative measures against tax avoidance by large companies in the European Union, both within the Union itself and in third countries (particularly developing countries) These should include measures to curb the shifting of income into Member States to avoid tax elsewhere.

3. Limits on Member States’ adoption of tax policies whose effect is to undercut the tax bases of other countries, whether in Europe or elsewhere, for instance by encouraging the shifting between jurisdictions of corporate assets such as intellectual property or financial assets. A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, though potentially useful against profit-shifting, would not be enough in itself to prevent harmful competition between Member States based on tax rates.

4. Measures to ensure that European tax rules do not undermine the ability of developing countries to raise their own taxes from corporations. As a first step the Commission should undertake a "spillover analysis” of Member States’ corporate tax regimes and bilateral taxation treaties with developing countries, as well as EU directives relating to international taxation. This analysis should be based on full access to the necessary data from Member States (on a confidential or anonymised basis if necessary). It should be published, and should include recommendations for concrete steps to enact the proposals listed here and any others that may be necessary.

The Commission should also support greater international cooperation on tax matters, above and beyond the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit-Shifting (BEPS) initiative, in a forum which enables developing and developed countries to participate on an equal footing. The Commission should support, and invite Member States to support, the creation of an intergovernmental body on tax cooperation under the auspices of the United Nations and call for a ministerial round table at the Financing for Development conference in Addis Ababa in July 2015 to discuss this issue.

We call on the European Commission to incorporate all these proposals into its forthcoming communications on tax transparency and fair and efficient corporate taxation, as announced on 18th February, and to set out in these communications the legislative and other means by which these proposals can be accomplished. We would welcome the opportunity to provide the Commission with more detailed input on these proposals.

Zugehörige Dateien:
Letter from Tax Justice Europe to the European Commission Mar 2015.pdfDownload (350 kb)

Personen:
>Markus Henn